What is “torture lite” the term, coined by the popular media, refers tosophisticated interrogation techniques that do not cause any clearlyvisible physical harms, as do more traditional forms of torture. Exampleof torture lite include sleep deprivation ,isolation, standing in stressposition, noise bombardment ,humiliation, mock executions ,andsubjecting the prisoner to heat and cold. Another notorious method iscalled water boarding: the suspect head is dunked into water or his head is wrapped in a wet towel to include the sensation of drowning. Incontrast to traditional forms of torture in which pain is directly inflictedupon the victim by the interrogator techniques do not require contactbetween the interrogator and the victim at all.Advances interrogation techniques are employed by a number ofdemocratic government, including the United States, as well as France ad the United kingdom. These methods are mainly used for the purpose ofintelligence gathering. Democratic government do not permit the moreclassic form of torture because the Geneva convention forbids them.Torture lite, as some argue, is this the only legal resort and is sometimesnecessary to prevent even greater harm. One important reason foremploying lite techniques, for instance, has been to prevent futureterrorist attacks. Since 9/11, the use of these techniques has becomemore common. Torture lite has particular gained notoriety because of itsemployment at Guantanamo bay and Abu Ghraib.The primary defense for using these techniques is utilitarian in nature.It’s supporter argue that by subjecting prisoners to these techniques wecan gain important information that can prevent great harm to society.Thus, the pain and suffering of one individual (or a few) is pinnedagainst the potential suffering of the many. This justification is oftencalled the “ticking bomb scenario”: imagine that there is a ticking bombhidden somewhere that threatens to kill millions of people, and the onlyway to find the bomb and prevent these death is to apply torture lite to the individual who knows where the bomb is hidden. Wouldn’t you bewilling to torture the individual in such a situation.?In reply to this scenario, Georgetown law professor David Laban hasover some interesting challenges. According to Luban, this scenariomakes some assumption that are seldom-if ever-met in reality . In thescenario for instance it is assumed that we know for sure that the suspecthas all of the information we need but when is that ever actually thecase? If we really don’t know what the suspects might be able to reveal,could we still be justified in torturing that individual as long as the oddsof getting that needed information high enough? How high should thoseodds be? Is 50/50 sufficient? Could torturing someone when there is justa 20% chance of success still be justified if enough is at stake? Shouldthe question of torture be a game of odds in the first place? Also, howmany individuals could we justifiably subject to torture lite because eventhe later can cause permanent psychological and physical harm.Standing in stress positions, for instance, can cause swollen ankles,blistering on the feet, and an increased heart rate. Carried far enough, it’skind of eventually lead to kidney failure and heart attack. Sleepdeprivation, meanwhile, can produce delusions, and in some cases, thesedelusions May remain heaven after deprivation has ceased. Torture litecan also cause post-traumatic stress disorder to such severity that thevictim may never be able to function as a normal member of society. PLEASE CREATE A 8-10 POWER POINT SLIDES ON THE TOPIC TORTURE LITE, IN YOUR RESEARCH AND POWER POINT PLEASE MAKE A REFERENCE TO THE ABOVE CASE STUDY.