Levels of Achievement

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NURS_6053_Module05_Week11_Assignment_Rubric

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Create a 5- or 6-slide narrated PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose. Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following: · An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (this can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment). · A description of the changes being proposed. · Justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace. Points: Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) Presentation provides an accurate and detailed executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace. Presentation accurately and completely describes in detail the changes being proposed. Presentation accurately and thoroughly details justifications for the changes, including a thorough and complete explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) Presentation provides an accurate executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace. Presentation accurately describes the changes being proposed. Presentation accurately justifies the changes, including an accurate explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) Presentation provides an executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace that is vague or inaccurate. Presentation describes the changes being proposed that is vague or inaccurate. Presentation vaguely or inaccurately justifies the changes, including a vague or inaccurate explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) Presentation provides an executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Presentation describes the changes being proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Presentation vaguely and inaccurately justifies the changes, including a vague and inaccurate explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace, or is missing. Feedback:
· Details about the type and scope of the proposed changes. · Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the changes. · Identification of a change management team (by title/role). · A plan for communicating the changes you propose. · A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the changes you propose. Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Presentation accurately and thoroughly details the type and scope of the changes proposed. Presentation accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. Presentation accurately and completely identifies a change management by title/role that is detailed. Presentation accurately and thoroughly proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. Presentation accurately and thoroughly describes in detail risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) Presentation accurately details the type and scope of the changes proposed. Presentation accurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. Presentation accurately identifies a change management by title/role. Presentation accurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. Presentation accurately describes risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Presentation details the type and scope of the changes proposed that is vague or inaccurate. Presentation identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes that is vague or inaccurate. Presentation identifies a change management by title/role that is vague or inaccurate. Presentation proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed that is vague or inaccurate. Presentation describes risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed that is vague or inaccurate. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) Presentation details the type and scope of the changes proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Presentation identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Presentation identifies a change management by title/role that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Presentation proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Presentation describes risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Feedback:
Include a narrated presentation that is 5–6 minutes in length. Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the presentation responses. Audio recording is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the presentation. Presentation should be aesthetically organized and easy to follow with an introduction, purpose statement, and conclusion Feedback: Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) Narrated presentation adequately summarizes the presentation responses. Audio recording is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the presentation. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the presentation responses. Audio recording may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the presentation. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) Narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the presentation or is missing. Audio recording is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the presentation, or is missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Create a 5- or 6-slide narrated PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose. Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following: · An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (this can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment). · A description of the changes being proposed. · Justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) Presentation provides an accurate and detailed executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace. Presentation accurately and completely describes in detail the changes being proposed. Presentation accurately and thoroughly details justifications for the changes, including a thorough and complete explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace. Good 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) Presentation provides an accurate executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace. Presentation accurately describes the changes being proposed. Presentation accurately justifies the changes, including an accurate explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace. Fair 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) Presentation provides an executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace that is vague or inaccurate. Presentation describes the changes being proposed that is vague or inaccurate. Presentation vaguely or inaccurately justifies the changes, including a vague or inaccurate explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace. Poor 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) Presentation provides an executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Presentation describes the changes being proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Presentation vaguely and inaccurately justifies the changes, including a vague and inaccurate explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace, or is missing. Feedback:

· Details about the type and scope of the proposed changes. · Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the changes. · Identification of a change management team (by title/role). · A plan for communicating the changes you propose. · A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the changes you propose.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Presentation accurately and thoroughly details the type and scope of the changes proposed. Presentation accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. Presentation accurately and completely identifies a change management by title/role that is detailed. Presentation accurately and thoroughly proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. Presentation accurately and thoroughly describes in detail risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed. Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) Presentation accurately details the type and scope of the changes proposed. Presentation accurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. Presentation accurately identifies a change management by title/role. Presentation accurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. Presentation accurately describes risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed. Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Presentation details the type and scope of the changes proposed that is vague or inaccurate. Presentation identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes that is vague or inaccurate. Presentation identifies a change management by title/role that is vague or inaccurate. Presentation proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed that is vague or inaccurate. Presentation describes risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed that is vague or inaccurate. Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) Presentation details the type and scope of the changes proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Presentation identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Presentation identifies a change management by title/role that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Presentation proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Presentation describes risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Feedback:

Include a narrated presentation that is 5–6 minutes in length.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the presentation responses. Audio recording is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the presentation. Presentation should be aesthetically organized and easy to follow with an introduction, purpose statement, and conclusion Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) Narrated presentation adequately summarizes the presentation responses. Audio recording is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the presentation. Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the presentation responses. Audio recording may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the presentation. Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) Narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the presentation or is missing. Audio recording is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the presentation, or is missing. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6053_Module05_Week11_Assignment_Rubric